Letter Sent to Various British Newspapers Questioning the Veracity of the Iranian Hostage Taking

Posted by; Phil Jayhan, April 1st, 2007 

The following letter was sent to various British newspapers by a colleague…

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you at a critical time and your active response to this message (or lack of it) could be very important in shaping the immediate future in fundamental ways.

Over the past 18 months or so, we have seen the demonization of Iran, with repeated stories, based on flimsy evidence, that they are about to make a Nuclear Bomb. Even if this were true (and credible sources deny the possibility <http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-04-14-iran-nukes_x.htm> )

[1], there are several other nations around the world that have these weapons (and would possibly use them given an excuse), so why is Iran such a “threat”?

The “Iran Stakes” in the media have recently been raised with the latest “hostage crisis”. However, many of us now know the game that is being played – and that certain groups and interests which control the media are guilty of not giving us the full picture and even giving us false information. To give you a good example, it has recently come to light that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Centre (WTC) Building 7 about 20 minutes before it actually collapsed <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW_JRe67v1g>  

[2] on Sept 11th 2001. Their response to this is that “they don’t really know why” and that they have now lost their tapes – of the most significant news event in recent history <http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html>  

[3]. Forgive us, then, if I no longer trust the media in the way I once did (read the comments on Richard Porter’s blog to get a sample of opinion). A petition about this matter has garnered over 3000 signatures <http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/>  

[4] asking the BBC to state the source of their information about the WTC 7 Collapse. Petition comments are also worth a read. (See here for information about WTC 7 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqpCol-Qvr8>  

[5])

I therefore now question the true circumstances of the capture of the British Sailors, on several grounds:

  • HMS Cornwall had a helicopter watching overhead so how did they not  see the Iranian fleet steam up and ‘surround’ the zodiacs? How do you surround  a rubber dinghy capable of 30 knots?

  • How was it that a BBC journalist (along with selected newspaper  journalists) embedded themselves with the actual ship that was going to be  involved with this major news story? How did they also just happen to  interview Faye Turney only a couple of hours before she goes  out <http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/video/86000/bb/86090_16x9_bb.ram>  on patrol? [6]

  • The normal procedure for a Royal Navy boarding party is for their  ship to be no more than 1800 metres (gun range) away from the designated ship  to be searched. If it was further than 2 kilometres, then this was a break  with normal SOPs (standing operational procedures).  If the Cornwall was within 2  kilometres, then why was no support given with warning shots?

  • HMS Cornwall has radar and high tech equipment – how did they  not pick up the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s patrol boats as they were  approaching the RN boarding party?


“HMS Cornwall could not come to their aid since the boarding took place in very shallow water. The frigate was more than four miles away at the time of the ambush, according to naval sources.” 

  • According to Navy News, the  draught of HMS Cornwall is 6.3 metres <http://www.navynews.co.uk/ships/cornwall.asp>  [8].  The Indian registered vessel being  checked by the Cornwall’s boarding party when their seizure occurred was  anchored in the channel leading to the Shatt al Arab waterway, which in turn  leads to the Al Basrah Port. This port is able to take vessels whose tonnage  is much bigger than the 4,850 tonnes of the Cornwall. The Channel Depth to the Al Basrah Port <http://steelmillsoftheworld.com/ports/display.asp?id=48400>   [9] is between 7.9 and 9.1 metres and that the anchorage is between 9.4 and  10.7 metres. So why did HMS Cornwall not steam to within 1 kilometre of the  suspect where it could offer close support, as is normal practice in a war  zone?
  • Former British Ambassador Craig  Murray has also raised concerns about the authenticity/validity of “The  Map” <http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1054>  [10] which has been used as evidence that the  sailors were snatched from Iraqi waters.


We know the false warnings were raised about WMD before the Iraq War. We know 9/11 was an “Inside Job” (who blew up WTC 7?). We must now turn the tide against inaccurate and incomplete reporting – which essentially amounts to propaganda. We must remember the terrible tragedy the Iraq occupation has become –  100’s of thousands of civilians and thousands of troops have been killed. I suggest this could all this could have been avoided if honest reporting had been allowed to take place.

We must realise that it is extremely likely that the Iranian military were baited into capturing the UK Sailors, in order to create an international incident – a modern “Gulf of Tonkin”. This then would be used to foment an attack that America seems to have been planning for several years <http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf>  [11].

I therefore insist that the facts presented above are fully investigated, disclosed and reported accurately. Those responsible for giving out false information, and those supporting this activity, should be identified and held accountable for their actions. Let us therefore try to prevent a potentially catastrophic conflict in the Middle East, which could result in huge devastation and enormous loss of life. You have the power to prevent this from happening. Use it wisely.

Yours Sincerely,

A very concerned citizen.

Links/References:

[1]           http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-04-14-iran-nukes_x.htm <http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-04-14-iran-nukes_x.htm>

[2]           http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW_JRe67v1g <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW_JRe67v1g>

[3]           http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html <http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html>

[4]           http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/ <http://www.petitiononline.com/wtc7bbc/>

[5]           http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqpCol-Qvr8 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqpCol-Qvr8>

[6]           http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/video/86000/bb/86090_16x9_bb.ram <http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/news/video/86000/bb/86090_16x9_bb.ram>

[7]           http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2044448,00.html <http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,2044448,00.html>

[8]           http://www.navynews.co.uk/ships/cornwall.asp <http://www.navynews.co.uk/ships/cornwall.asp>

[9]           http://steelmillsoftheworld.com/ports/display.asp?id=48400 <http://steelmillsoftheworld.com/ports/display.asp?id=48400>

[10]       http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1054 <http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1054>

[11]       http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf <http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf>

######################################################


9/11 was an inside job. Our nation is in peril.
The perpetrators are in positions of power.
Demand a new investigation.
Stand up. Be counted.

 

Discuss this in our Forums! Click on the Banner Below

Advertisements

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: