More Canadian News Media Groups Expose 911

Several Canadian newspapers are beginning to blow the whistle on 9/11 in quick succession. The Winnipeg Sun Editor, who was the first, hasn’t lost his job yet. Even more significantly, this story was also carried in the Edmonton Sun, implying a certain tolerance for these stories on the part of the management of that Canadian group. Both are subsidiaries of the “Sun Media Corporation”, part of the Quebecor Group. Now The Canadian and Vive Le Canada have also joined the swell…

Scholars debate 9/11 findings

by John Gleeson
Winnepeg Sun

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Columnists/Gleeson_John/2007/04/18/4055849.html
Wed, April 18, 2007

“…it was the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004 that breathed full life into the 9/11 Truth Movement — because it was now apparent to many that the ‘official story’ relied on massive distortion and evasion… The most dramatically disputed aspect of 9/11 is the question of what the world really saw that day in New York City, when three steel-frame high-rises — the 110-storey Twin Towers and the 47-storey WTC 7 — collapsed at near free-fall speed neatly into their own footprints…”

An unbiased observer doesn’t need to look beyond what’s happening on the ground today in Iraq and Afghanistan to conclude the War on Terror has been a brutal, manipulative means to a transparently self-serving end.

None of this is news, however, to proponents of “9/11 Truth,” a worldwide movement that seems to keep growing despite an unofficial media blackout on their questions and investigations. So what are these “Truthers” saying?

Many people were quick to declare 9/11 a possible “inside job” based on the visible facts themselves, in particular the blanket failure of air defence, which even former Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura said defied all logic and precedent. They also seized on the history (largely unknown in North America) of Pentagon-linked “false-flag” terrorist attacks in Europe during the Cold War, and CIA involvement with al-Qaida operations.

With the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, it was seen that 9/11 was amazingly fortuitous to the Bush administration, elements of which had been looking for excuses to invade both countries — for purely strategic-commercial reasons — in the months and years prior to the attacks.

But it was the release of the 9/11 Commission Report in 2004 that breathed full life into the 9/11 Truth Movement — because it was now apparent to many that the “official story” relied on massive distortion and evasion.

The most dramatically disputed aspect of 9/11 is the question of what the world really saw that day in New York City, when three steel-frame high-rises — the 110-storey Twin Towers and the 47-storey WTC 7 — collapsed at near free-fall speed neatly into their own footprints.

In 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out (Olive Branch Press, 2007), former Brigham Young University physics professor Steven Jones argues forcefully that the nature of the collapses, the presence of large pools of molten metal in the basements of all three buildings, witness accounts of hearing explosions — that these and other factors point to the conclusion all three buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.

This view, though rejected by Popular Mechanics and defenders of the status quo, has won support from engineers and academics from other disciplines. For instance, John McMurtry, a philosophy professor emeritus at the University of Guelph and fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, credits Prof. John Valleau of the Chemistry-Physics Research Group at University of Toronto for drawing his attention to “this scientific anomaly.” McMurtry concludes: “The instant and inexplicable collapses of the WTC buildings in uniform demolition style could not be explained by fire (plus, in the case of the Twin Towers, the impact of the airplanes) without contradicting the laws of engineering physics.”

To see the Rest of this story, Click the Image below;

Click Here for Part II

 

Discuss 911 in our Forums! Click on the Banner Below

Read more of this post

Virginia Tech Shooters Rant on Google: Blames Jesus Christ

Virginia Tech Shooters Rant on Google: Who writes this stuff for these guys?

Google Link

Post this on your own blog; Either use this link or find the code you need here;

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=4283922322575448930
Cho’s Madness: ‘You Forced Me Into a Corner’ — Update
NBC is releasing segments of Cho’s video statements, which were reportedly contained in 27 QuickTime video files that were linked into a hypertext version of his 1,800-word manifesto at the appropriate places. The network has also released some of the 29 photos Cho sent in the package, including the one above.The name on the return address was “A. Ishmael”, which makes it clear for the first time that the mysterious phrase found written written on his arm represents an alter ego.

From Cho’s statements:

Original link:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstrok…..id=1512499
_________________
The Blood of those from 911 cries out from the ground for Justice! Lets Roll!
http://www.letsroll911.org!

Back to top
   

 

 

Pure Massacre Killer Slaughters 32 Students, Dozens Wounded, At American College – A Second Killer Escaped The Police?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Pure Massacre:


Killer Slaughters 32 Students, Dozens Wounded, At American College

A Second Killer Escaped The Police?

Students wait out the shootings…

BREAKING/UPDATE : A reporter on SBS News in Australia, doing a live cross from outside Virginia Tech, just claimed that he received information that there was a “mystery” about the identity of the man who went on a killing spree inside classrooms at the Tech. He said police are now thinking there were two killers, one who shot the female student and student advisor in a dorm, and another who did the killings in the Norris Hall Engineering block.

He said if there was no connection between the two shooting sprees it would be something of a “monumental coincidence” to have two shootings on the same campus within two hours of each other.

Apparently the descriptions of the man who was seen leaving the dorm and the man who killed more than 30 students on the other side of the campus, at Norris Hall, do not match up.

News on this is still breaking, so the “mystery” may already be resolved by the time you read this. However, the possibility of two separate killers would give credence to police and college officials’ claims that they believed the shootings were over once police had secured the dorm, even though the gunman had not been detained.

A second killer would explain how officials and police were taken completely by surprise by the second, far more deadly, shooting spree, two hours later on the other side of the campus.

However, the official story thus far gets murky. The same report on SBS News also said that email warnings were circulated to students to look out for someone who may be dangerous and for students to report suspicious behaviour to police or officials, just before the second shooting spree began.

Presumably, this e-mail warning refers to the first killer, who is believed to have left the dorm after he shot his girlfriend and a student advisor, if that story actually stands up to scrutinising. And there’s no guarantee that the facts as known of the first shooting will not change as well.

Previously….

Only days before the eighth anniversary of the Columbine massacre, a technical college in Virginia, USA, becomes the scene of the worst mass shooting of civilians in American history.

At 7am, a man entered a college dorm room and reportedly argued with his girlfriend. Around 7.15am, a student advisor attempted to intervene in the confrontation, and the young man then reportedly shot his girlfriend and the advisor dead.

Some two hours later, on the other side of the huge college campus, presumably the same young man began methodically killing students in their classrooms. Police locked down the campus, but the massacre was reportedly over in a matter of minutes. The gunman is dead, either shot by police or by his own hand.

It is very difficult to shoot yourself when you are handcuffed! These pictures below are in dispute, and some are saying it is not of the shooter but of a Journalist who might have been falsely apprehended in the confusion. More to come, still developing.


Read more of this post

Exclusive: Karl Rove Heckled And Pelted With Rocks Marked as: Featured – Video

Exclusive: Karl Rove Heckled And Pelted With Rocks Marked as: Featured

(03/04/07) WASHINGTON – White House aide Karl Rove came face to face with angry protesters after speaking to the Young Republican Club at American University Tuesday night, with about 20 students lying down in front of his car.

Student Josh Goodman told The Washington Post other students kicked Rove’s car, “and tried to stop it as best they could.”

Goodman, an AU junior, said he and others wanted to make a “citizens arrest” of the presidential adviser.

This is exclusive eyewitness video of the incident. This low-res video was captured on a cell phone.
____
The video, which is very poor quality, is here: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b08_1175693599

“World after 9/11 attacks: War on terror or US propaganda?” by; Pravda

Posted by; Phil Jayhan, April 4th, 2007

Source: Pravda, the leading Russian daily newspaper. This is a devastating expose’ of the 9/11 cover-up; I wish every skeptic out there could read it. The article ultimately asks, provocatively, “Are we mice, or men?”… No, my friends, freedom isn’t free — but that certainly won’t stop the millions of cowards out there from feeding at the victory feast when the truth finally surfaces, will it?…

“World after 9/11 attacks: War on terror or US propaganda?”

There is no war on terrorism

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/76020-terorrism-0

16.02.2006

“…The 9/11 attacks were created for justification of U.S. covert plans to grab influence over oil politics in the Middle East and as an excuse to take away the rest of Americans’ liberties through a manufactured threat-scenario called ‘The War On Terror’…”

All the stories we see in the TV news, print and Internet media today are like mice in a small room occupied by a grizzly bear. We can see the bear, hear him panting and growling as he attempts to stomp on us, but everyone pretends he’s just not there, even though he’s eating all the food and we mice are starving.

The bear is the U.S. government and media cover up of the 9/11 attacks. They never came close to proving that foreign “terrorists” were involved. Of all four missing planes’ passenger manifests, not one Middle Easterner <http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/PassengerList.shtml> was on any of them. A jihadist who is bravely going to his death for the sake of his beliefs in Allah and Islam is a martyr and wants the whole world to know it. Martyr’s families receive reverential praise and support in their communities for decades. Yet not one of the “terrorists” the American government <http://english.pravda.ru/cis/2001/09/25/16199.html> insists were on the aircraft used their real names or were listed on the passenger lists. At least seven of the nineteen ‘hijackers’ are still alive <http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/9-11/9-11_hijackers_still_alive.htm> .

The 9/11 attacks were created for justification of U.S. covert plans to grab influence over oil politics in the Middle East and as an excuse to take away the rest of Americans’ liberties through a manufactured threat-scenario called, “The War On Terror.”

What good are all the thousands of articles about politics, global warming, education, scandals, religion, economics and how we must always go out and vote so that we can “make a difference”? If our votes really did make a difference, they’d be illegal.

Who cares about such articles when the cover up of what really happened on 9/11 is hands-off, an untouchable leper? What good are they when in the name of a phony “terrorist attack,” our way of life no longer exists except at the pleasure of corporate-driven federal socialists? We are being starved of our liberties by a ursus horribulus that stomps every mouse who dares get in his way or mention that he’s there.

I see a lot of authors write all around the grizzly bear, almost approaching the truth, but none seem to have the conviction to call for an open door to run the bear out of the house. Our Founding Fathers <http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/88/354/16618_Russia.html> would have made a bearskin rug.

I will tell you here and tell you now with no equivocation: THE 9/11 ATTACKS WERE NOT DONE BY MUSLIM TERRORISTS. They were done by American Terrorists. The Muslims were the patsies.

To see the Rest of this story, Click the Image below;

Click Here for Part II

 

Discuss 911 in our Forums! Click on the Banner Below

Read more of this post

The Illegal, Unconstitutional Income Tax in America – Never Ratified by the States

Posted by: Phil Jayhan

Original link: http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=FinalWarn02-4

Chapter 2.4: The Federal Income Tax
Collecting the interest payments for the owners of the Federal Reserve

The Federal Income Tax

With the Illuminati in complete control of our monetary system, they were ready for the next step. They couldn’t touch the money of the people, because the Constitution did not contain any provision for the taxing of income; so they now set into motion a plan to accomplish this, in order to oppress the middle class, and increase the lower class, who would have to depend on the government for their survival.

From 1862-72, to support the Civil War effort, Congress enacted the nation’s first income tax: 3% on incomes from $600 to $10,000, and 5% for incomes above that, which was later deemed to be insufficient, and it was increased twice, till it reached a high of 10% on all incomes over $5,000. The tax was criticized because it wasn’t apportioned among the states according to population. The Act of 1862 also provided for a sales tax, excise tax, and inheritance tax; and established the office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue, who was given the power to assess, levy, and collect taxes, and was given the authority to enforce tax laws. In 1868, tobacco and alcoholic beverages were taxed.

The income tax was discontinued in 1872, but after heavy lobbying by the Populist Party, it was reinstated in 1894, as part of the Wilson-German Tariff Bill, when Congress enacted a 2% tax on all incomes over $4,000 a year. On May 20, 1895, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the tax was unconstitutional, because it was not distributed among the states in accordance with the Constitution. Newspapers controlled by the Illuminati denounced the Court’s decision.

To see the Rest of this story, Click the Image below;

Click Here for Part II

 

Discuss 911 in our Forums! Click on the Banner Below

Read more of this post

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 124 other followers